Am 30.10.2013 um 17:31 schrieb Matthew B. Brookover <mbrookov@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:22 +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 29.10.2013 um 22:56 schrieb Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> no - how do you come to this idea?
>>
>> In the last decade i saw very strange results while updating
>> or doing similar things. the question above is more a theoretical
>> thought despite the rational knowledge that in this example
>> (communication-layer) the compatibility is preserved.
>
> I have always tried to keep the client libraries in sync with the
> database in my own code. I was surprised that the upstream builders had
> mixed the 5.0 client with the 5.5 data base. I know of cases where
> library developers will provide for compatibility with various versions
> of protocols. It looks to me like this is one of those cases.
>
> We are using Perl and PHP with MySQL, and both seem to work with the 5.0
> client library on the 5.5 database.
>
> Besides the usual tests like create a new web page, delete a web page,
> edit a page, etc, we pointed a spider that is part of burp suite at the
> web site on a development system. The web site is several thousand
> pages, some are PHP with parts that are pulled from an upgraded mysql
> 5.5 data base and others are flat files. Burp suite has been running
> for several hours and every thing looks good so far.
interesting, thanks for sharing.
> I think this weekend, we will start moving production servers from
> CentOS 5.9 to 5.10 and from MySQL 5.0 to 5.5.
--
LF
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
