Re: NetworkManager substitute??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 28.10.2013 18:23, Fred Smith wrote:
> thanks, I'll go take a look.  As far as I can tell from all the
> aforementioned HOWTOs, bridged is the way to do it?? none of 'em
> says anything about doing it any other way. what am I overlooking
> in my ignorance?

If all you want is just to have a local VM and no special requirements, 
libvirt provides you with a virtual bridge (virbr0) that is NAT-ed to 
your public uplink.
All VMs are by default connected to this virtual bridge, unless you 
specify otherwise and given an IP from the 192.168.122.0/24 range; your 
host machine will be 192.168.122.1.

All of the above happens autmagically once you start libvirtd. If you 
want to have the VM on the same public network as the host then indeed 
you need to configure a bridge manully and connect both your public 
interface (eth0) and your virtual machine's interface (vnetX) to it.

HTH

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux