Am 25.10.2013 um 00:47 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 10/24/2013 2:59 PM, Lists wrote:
>>>> (*) ran into a guy who had 100s of zfs 'file systems' (mount points),
>>>> per user home directories, and was doing nightly snapshots going back
>>>> several years, and his zfs commands were taking a long long time to do
>>>> anything, and he couldn't figure out why. I think he had over 10,000
>>>> filesystems * snapshots.
>> Wow. Couldn't he have the same results by putting all the home
>> directories on a single ZFS partition?
>
> I believe he wanted quotas per user. ZFS quotas were only implemented
> at the file system level, at least as of whatever version he was running
> (I don't know if thats changed, as I never mess with quotas).
>
>
User and group quotas have been possible for some time.
ZFS is cool. But there are a lot of issues and stuff that needs to be tuned but is difficult to find out if it needs to be tuned.
Especially, if you run into performance-problems.
Once you have some experience with it, I recommend reading this blog:
http://nex7.blogspot.ch
and of course, the FreeNAS forum, where you can read about stuff like that:
https://bugs.freenas.org/issues/1531
On the surface, ZFS is great. But god help you if you run into problems.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
