John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/16/2013 1:29 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> No. Block domains.
> how? 90%+ of spam has forged FROM addresses.
>From crap in my trash from today:
Received: from [206.214.95.82] (port=57577 helo=03e6231b.buhlgymgagate.us)
by host290.hostmonster.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <KohlsGiftCardSurvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
id 1VLfOH-0003sR-20
for m.roth@xxxxxxxxx; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:27:25 -0600
Received: by 03e6231b.bw31almxu.buhlgymgagate.us
(amavisd-new, port 10268) with ESMTP id 03NGCCNSDRE623JKCXHVTJ1B; for
<m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:27:24 -0700
To: m.roth@xxxxxxxxx
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:unsub-2268-733-2332-11-65411647@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>,
<http://www.buhlgymgagate.us/unsubscribe/2268/733/2332/11/65411647/~~m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
From: "Kohls Gift Card Survey" <KohlsGiftCardSurvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
So, it looks like mmm, (check whois) Jeff Martinez should be blocked at
buhlgymgagate.us. On the other hand, I look at the headers to one of my
posts, and I see that it's coming from, ta-da, 5-cent.us. If I were
sending out spam, then you'd be perfectly justified in blocking 5-cent.us.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
