Re: nfs4, idmapd, users with same name, different uid?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




----- Original Message -----
| On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Barbara Krasovec
| <barbarak@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > >>
| >> I have no experience with idmapd in linux, but in solaris and
| >> netapp it
| >> gets ugly quite easily :-)
| >>
| > It also works with same UID-s on server/client, just setting the
| > domainname in idmapd.conf. Ldap is not obligatory.
| 
| This is a small lab-type setting but I'm trying to merge two sets of
| machines set up by different groups to have a common home directory
| server that all the others automount.  The number of users is small
| enough that I'll just 'usermod' them into the same uid numbers, but I
| don't see why it is worth running the idmapd daemon at all, when all
| it does is map everyone to nobody if you forget to set the domains
| identically.   And after fixing the uids to match, is there any
| advantage to nfsv4 at all?

Over NFSv3?  Yes, single port for traffic and extended ACLs.  Throw in Kerberos and you have authenticated access to resources.

-- 
James A. Peltier
Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone   : 778-782-6573
Fax     : 778-782-3045
E-Mail  : jpeltier@xxxxxx
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices

“A successful person is one who can lay a solid foundation from the bricks others have thrown at them.” -David Brinkley via Luke Shaw
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux