On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > >>> redistribution of SOURCE. have you READ the GPL ? > >> > >> Please quote the section that you think exempts binaries > > > > *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* > > *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* > > *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* > > Sorry, but that quote does not appear in any copy of the GPL that I > can find. And it's not true, either. Everything it says is about > 'works as a whole' and anything that can be considered a copy or > derivative work under copyright law. > > <snip> Copyright law != Trademark law. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos