Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> To oversimplify, say that you have rpmforge, base, and epel repos. Say >> that all of them have versions of perl. However, these versions may >> conflict with each other and break things. >> >> So, if you gave base and updates priority of 1, then the others, even if >> they have a later version of perl, won't install it. The downside is >> that >> you're running the older version. The upside is that you don't risk this >> newer version of perl breaking some other package that you'd forgotten. But what if a package in rpmforge requires a newer version of a package that is available in rpmforge but not in updates? Surely this is very likely to happen? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos