On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 23:01 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > It works brilliantly when your mail (SMTP) or news (NNTP) reader tracks > via 30+ year old Message-ID. That way you can thread dozens or even > hundreds of follow-ups, even if the topic changes, while still allowing > others to not have to read through dozens before getting to it. Take the "Putting nat routing into place permanently thread" for example (just a few posts in): http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-November/thread.html Look at all the changes in the discussion. By threading by Message-ID, the subject can be appended (or even pre-pended with the RE/WAS combo) and let browsers find the relevant section rather quickly. And this was a _short_ thread. Imagine a much longer one! ;-> > I receive more thanks from people who find my stuff buried in Google > searches than I receive complaints from GMail users, so I continue to > use the O'Reilly Guidelines. BTW, I don't say that because of my ego or some @$$-covering move. Remember, it's much easier for me just to hit "reply" and not care. I literally get thanx for giving hints in a threaded archive for saving people a lot of time when they find discussions with me in a Google search. -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- For everything else *COUGH*commercials*COUGH* there's "ManningCard"