On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:59 PM, <isdtor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > That's the concept behind the classic mode that was added as part of
> > Gnome 3.8 and will be the default desktop on RHEL 7. Its user
> > experience is right in line with Gnome 2 and isn't too much off a
> > shift for existing users of RHEL, so I don't think there's any reason
> > to get out the pitchforks.
>
> Classic mode is a joke. I've tried it briefly on F19 and only agree
> with
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?s=d8e300363d613f371d2f39a913480ca9&p=1654983&postcount=2.
> We want our users to be productive from day one. Fiddling around with
> this extension and that extension for 28 days to get a usable desktop
> is not an option (although Gallagher's review is quite good in most
> regards,
I would disagree with that statement. I've always felt that Nautilus
was a horrible interface and I've always been perplexed by the default
behavior of opening a new window when I click on a folder. So you're
never gonna make everyone happy.
> http://sgallagh.wordpress.com/2013/05/30/one-week-with-gnome-3-classic-prologue/.
>
> I'm looking forward to the first RHEL7 beta to see first hand what we
> will be having to deal with. Haven't seen much more than RH Summit
> presentations yet.
Have you even tried the classic mode? From the times that I've used
it, it is pretty close to a Gnome 2 style of user interface and it
seemed like it would be pretty familiar to anyone that's used to Gnome
2.
Dave
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
