Re: picture viewers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:34:49AM -0400, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> John Doe wrote:
>> > From: "m.roth@xxxxxxxxx" <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> >> Are there any other ->light weight<- image viewers in the standard
>> >> repositories, including epel? I DO NOT WANT OR NEED a "semantic
>> >> desktop"
>> >
>> > How much lightweight...?
>> > gqview?
>> > ImageMagick's barebone display command?
>>
>> *shrug* kuickshow used to be fine. gwenview was fine, until they made
>> nepomuk a requirement. gqview, I don't know - what CentOS package is it
>> in? All I want is something to put a pic up on my desktop.
>
> on 6.x the default image viewer seems to be "gthumb image viewer". Is
> there some reason for not using that?

Don't see it installed. I assume that's gnome, and it may not have been
installed (I dislike gnome). I will say, gqview is *incredibly* fast to
come up... why, you'd think I was on a 486, not an 8088. <g>

        mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux