SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I see we agree.

Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(610)796-5838

Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(610)796-5838

>>> mailing-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx 11/21/05 08:00AM >>>
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 04:38 -0800, Brian T. Brunner wrote:
> Thanks, Mike.
> 
> What I read is that SELinux is still 'beta', and while the need for good 
> security is decades old, we (CentOS/RHEL folks) should not be presumed 
> to be willing beta testers.  "Enabled by default" presumes I'm willing.
> 
> Brian Brunner
> brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> (610)796-5838
It is not enabled by default ... unless you click through
screens 

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux