On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > I want to create a storage with more then 16TB based on GlusterFS since
> > it allows me to use 2-3 rings FS which will allow me to put the storage
> > in a form of:
> > 1 client -> HA NFS servers -> GlusterFS cluster.
>
> If you really only have one client, you might look at ceph for
> distributed block storage with xfs on top so you don't need to run
>
Or DRBD [0] to block replicate the storage
I know a handful of people on the lists here use DRBD on the virtualization
clusters.
A quick Google search for 'ceph vs drbd' yields these URLs [1] [2] the OP
might also look at.
> through fuse. Or if your application can be changed to use the s3
> interface you could get away from the posix filesystem bottlenecks
> completely.
>
> No experience with this stuff - just sounds like the promising
> up-and-coming thing...
>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
[0] http://www.drbd.org/
[1] http://ceph.com/community/ceph-comes-to-synnefo-and-ganeti/
[2]
http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10452-Why-a-Shared-or-Cluster-Filesystem-is-better-than-LVM-for-DRBD
--
---~~.~~---
Mike
// SilverTip257 //
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
