Re: what's wrong with dag.wieers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Am 03.07.2013 um 15:10 schrieb Pete Geenhuizen <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 07/03/2013 08:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Tue, July 2, 2013 17:34, John Hinton wrote:
>> 
>> Ditto here, and for the same reasons.
>> 
>> This was our experience as well; changing userids between clam and
>> clamav between updates caused us a lot of avoidable headaches.  We
>> switched to epel for clamav because of that one issue.  Otherwise we
>> have been very pleased with rpmforge.  It will prove a great loss if
>> there is a serious possibility that this resource might fade away.
>> 
>> 
> Fading away is a distinct possibility.
> David  Hrbac, who is trying to maintain rpmforge had this to say on that 
> subject.
> 
> 	"And of course, there's still a question about the Repoforge. Do we
> 	really want it? Isn't a time for Epel to replace Repoforge? I still want
> 	to keep Repoforge alive bud have no replies from Dag."


for an assessment of such statements is the context essential (Subject: Clamav)

http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/thread.html

--
LF









_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux