On 7/2/2013 5:18 PM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 04:02 PM, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
>> Hi,
>> What happened to dag.wieers? There is an update for clamav but the rpm is
>> still not distibuted after 4 weeks or more. :-)
>> What's wrong there?
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>>
> I asked about clamav on the repoforge list, and apparently there are
> some longstanding on-going issues with rpmforge, not sure exactly what
> and that apparently for quite some time some people have been attempting
> to resolve them.
>
> Due to the length of time that these problems have existed there's also
> a fair amount of skepticism that the issues will be resolved.
>
> There are several suggestions on how to resolve the clamav issue, one of
> them was to use the version from epel which is what I opted to do.
> Depending on your point of view I found it to be a relatively easy
> switch, just had to deal with a few ownership issues.
>
> All in all it's a shame that there are issues as I've used rpmforge for
> years and have been pleased with the repo.
>
> Pete
>
I very much liked the rpmforge repo for many years. However, clamav was
one that I wasn't so happy with from them. It seems the username would
switch back and forth from clam to clamav to clam to clamav and I would
have a non-working version which I didn't always know about. (log file
wrong user permission problems)
I switched the clamav install to epel and have had flawless success with
their packaging. It's easy to do excludes for various repos so that you
don't get conflicting installations.
Rpmforge and Daz have done great work and I'm not meaning for this to
sound negative. It was just this one package. Maybe it was two packagers
switching the username depending on who did the update? I don't know.
John Hinton
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
