[OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Dag Wieers wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Craig White wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 22:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Craig, it's not about being interested or disinterested.  The
>>>discussion has completely turned into a urinating contest between
>>>those that will and those that won't.  Yes, I know how to delete
>>>things, but is still fills up the mailbox with unnecessary chatter.  I
>>>don't think I'm alone in wanting the thread to go away either.  3 or 4
>>>days worth is enough.  Take it to personal e-mail.  I'm in learning
>>>stages with CentOS and linux in general.  I sure can't learn anything
>>>from this conversation other than who can create the longest post.
>>>      
>>>
>>so if there's 10 of you that want the thread to die and there's 1000
>>people subscribed does that make it significant?
>>    
>>
>
>Maybe the 990 others are sensible enough to not add their own voice to the 
>current noisy mess in order to save whatsever left of this list. At least 
>they didn't join the endless discussion.
>  
>

How many members are there?  There are only a small number that post 
messages.  I'd be curious to know how many people are subscribed to the 
list.

Best regards,


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux