Op 05-06-13 07:23, James Hogarth schreef:
>> Long time here too... But MASQUERADE on both interfaces feels wrong given
> what it does... Shouldn't this only be on the 'outside' of a router... Or
> did this change at some point in the last few years?
>
> That's what I get for checking mailing lists when I first wake up... The OP
> has eth+ lines in his iptables but the interfaces are em+
>
> OP was this iptables generated from some sort of tool or hand crafted? I'd
> go back to basics personally and flush it all starting from scratch and do
> it properly for the system at hand...
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hello,
thanks for the reactions
it's generated by a script, and I probably put too much in iptables
manually trying to get it to work.
I would be happy to test further and determine what is the minimum
needed in iptables to make it work,
but this ltsp-setup is giving me other problems that I have to solve
first, if I ever want to use it.
Lesson learned here is : do not use the script but indeed do it properly.
Greetings, J.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
