On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 18:32 -0800, Preston Crawford wrote: > > Everyone should get the opportunity to speak their piece - regardless of > > whether you agree or not, and if you're not interested in the > > thread...just delete it. > > > > Craig > > Now that's crazy talk. :-) ---- insanity is hereditary...I got it from my kids Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
[OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: craigwhite at azapple.com (Craig White)
- Date: Sat Nov 19 02:29:24 2005
- In-reply-to: <2698.170.104.147.110.1132367553.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <s37d7afb.062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200511182015.08955.lowen@xxxxxxxx> <437E8000.6060409@xxxxxxxxxx> <1132366183.6781.148.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2698.170.104.147.110.1132367553.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Brian T. Brunner
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Lamar Owen
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Sam Drinkard
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Craig White
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Preston Crawford
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Prev by Date: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Next by Date: SELinux threads, cynicism, one-upmanship, etc.
- Previous by thread: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Next by thread: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Index(es):
 |