Craig White wrote: >On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 16:41 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > > >>James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> > > > >---- >I got the impression that it was an upstream decision...just like mysql- >server > >Craig > > > > Could be, like the deal with sendmail. I assume (wrong thing to do it seems) that things you think would be protected aren't and things that aren't are. -- Snowman
PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- From: sam at wa4phy.net (Sam Drinkard)
- Date: Fri Nov 18 22:10:18 2005
- In-reply-to: <1132350258.6781.103.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <437DF675.23973.13B02491@localhost> <437E4A75.20501@xxxxxxxxxx> <1132350258.6781.103.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- From: Craig White
- PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- References:
- PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- From: James B. Byrne
- PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- From: Sam Drinkard
- PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- From: Craig White
- PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- Prev by Date: Re: x windows and i810 chipset -- vesa instead of i810 driver?
- Next by Date: PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- Previous by thread: PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- Next by thread: PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS4
- Index(es):
 |