On 05/13/2013 07:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/12/2013 09:20 AM, Ryan Wagoner wrote: >> Anyone know the reason RHEL bumped Samba from 3.5.10 to 3.6.9? This version >> has a regression with BackupExec and Veeam backing up to network shares. I >> receive access denied errors. Samba is in security=user mode and not joined >> to a domain. If I downgrade just the Samba packages to the CentOS 6.3 >> version 3.5.10 everything works again. I've found a couple of bug reports >> and the one suggested fix "acl check permissions = no" doesn't work. >> >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8414 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918537 > Look at comment #23 here: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8676#c23 > > As to why it was upgraded, who knows ... we build what is released, > rational on a rebase is above our paygrade :D That other link is only likely relevant if you have winbind enabled ... if not, maybe this one: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8414#c63 (turn off ntlvm2 on win7 clients)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
