Am 10.05.2013 um 23:49 schrieb Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/10/2013 05:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 10.05.2013 23:41, schrieb Digimer:
>>> Because CentOS works just fine for them. They've used it going back to
>>> CentOS 4 days without issue. Suggesting they rebuild long-in-production
>>> servers for the sake of a backup company is not going to fly.
>>
>> who needs to rebuild?
>> replace the release-packages and you are mostly done
>>
>> that is what "binary compatible" means
>> the only changes in CentOS are release name and logos / trademarks
>>
>>> That it is someone else's money doesn't change my responsibility to
>>> deliver the best bang for the buck
>>
>> that is a differnet story as above
>>
>> after years of expierience i would recommend let them alone
>> in case of service you can and will not provide at your own
>> because you will be resposible for any mistake from the
>> customers point of view becasue you recommended whatever
>
> As I mentioned initially; We don't do backups and we don't want to do
> it, either. That said, it's a service our clients are (strongly) asking
> for.
>
> We're not looking for a company to simply recommend, but one to partner
> with or become a reseller of. The goal is that the client maintains a
> single point of contact, us, and we pay a proper backup company for the
> support and service.
Not sure what your scenario looks like but what about
http://www.baculasystems.com
--
LF
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
