Mark Belanger wrote: > Bryan J. Smith wrote: > >> >> But in a professional environment, I _avoid_ e-mail. > > > Boy I'd hate to see the volume of mail you'd generate > if you *weren't* avoiding email. :) > > -Mark > > Ditto on the e-mail! -- Snowman
[OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: sam at wa4phy.net (Sam Drinkard)
- Date: Fri Nov 18 18:15:52 2005
- In-reply-to: <437DEB6E.9080709@xxxxxxx>
- References: <s37d6a0c.074@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1132322674.6346.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1132325614.5717.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <437DEB6E.9080709@xxxxxxx>
- References:
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Brian T. Brunner
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Craig White
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Bryan J. Smith
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- From: Mark Belanger
- [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Prev by Date: Beware - Yum 3.5 to 3.6 upgrade replaces named.conf
- Next by Date: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Previous by thread: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC -- UT2K4: Red Face v. Blue Gene
- Next by thread: [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
- Index(es):
 |