> Chris Mauritz wrote:
>> Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>>After reading through the various SELinux threads, I really became quite
>>perturbed. I mean, really quite perturbed.
>>
>>
>
> If you get perturbed over something so trivial, perhaps it's time to
> re-examine your priorities in life. 8-)
Indeed. It's nothing personal. We're not your employees. What's to get
perturbed about? I personally DO use SELinux. Everything works, so I don't
bother turning it off. But I can see how it gets in the way for others.
>>Neither would a sysadmin with as much cynicism as has been displayed, or
>> an
>>automatic 'it broke things' when something new (and in fact improved)
>> comes
>>along get a job here. Do realize that this list is archived, and that
>> many
>>people who are hiring might use Google to find your name (or mine, for
>> that
>>matter).
What you said there was really funny. So let's assume said fictional
employer Googles to see what Lamar Owen is up to. What's going to look
worse, people turning off SELinux or someone getting "perturbed" because
someone turned off SELinux? People skills are part of any job usually.
>>
>>
>
> Fantastic! I'll also state for the record here that I won't dig
> ditches. So any potential employer intending to hire me for ditch
> digging or sysadmining and is googling net archives can stop reading
> now. *shrug*
>
> Cheers,
:-)
Preston
