James Pearson wrote: > We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with > 6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only > file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system > > The following shows the issue: > > mkdir -p /mnt/tmp > mount -t tmpfs -o size=1% none /mnt/tmp > rm -f /tmp/file > ln -s /tmp/file /mnt/tmp/file > mount -o remount,ro /mnt/tmp > echo "some text" > /mnt/tmp/file <snip> That's weird, all right... but I would *never* have tried that, because I assume that ro mean READ ONLY. IMO, if you could write *anything* to a read-only filesystem, that was a serious bug, both in design and in security (gee, what a *great* way to get malware where it shouldn't be!). mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos