On 04/07/13 19:53, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:35:17PM -0400, mark wrote:
>>>
>>> ls -l /dev/fd?
>>>
>>> What do you see?
>>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 7 15:03 /dev/fd -> /proc/self/fd/
>
> Interesting as that doesn't match the pattern /dev/fd?
>
>> And, while we're at it, ll of /dev/floppy shows
>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 7 15:03 /dev/floppy -> fd0
>
> fd0 should have been shown by the ls -l /dev/fd? pattern so is that a
> broken link?
>
> "lsmod | grep floppy" - does it show the floppy module loaded?
>
> If "ls -l /dev/fd0*" does not show a series of device nodes try:
It does - /dev/fd0, along with all 14 sizes of floppies, of a patter
/dev/fd0u<disk capacity>
<snip>
mark
--
And yet less thanks have we than you. Users scowl at us, and reporters
give us scornful names. "Geek" I am to one fat man who lives a firewall
away from foes that would steal his identity or lay his little computer
in ruin, if it was not guarded ceaselessly. Yet we would not have it
otherwise. ---Aragorn, sysadmin.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
