On 03/15/2013 10:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Ned Slider <ned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Mark - as a general word of advise, next time you have an issue, rather >> than ranting because something isn't working as you expect and calling >> people stupid, perhaps you could try describing the problem you are >> experiencing in a rational manor and provide supporting information. It >> seems you had already decided it was someone else's fault and were more >> interested in blaming others than examining your own issues. > This is a generic issue that deserves at least some ranting, although > not particularly at you. As long as the distro requires the use of a > repository that by policy excludes things that almost everyone needs > we are pretty much forced to use 3rd party repositories that almost by > definition are uncoordinated in a way that makes their interaction > unpredictable and any defensive configuration measures likely to fail. > I don't see any possibility of changing this, so what else is there > to do but rant? Well, if you know what the goal of CentOS is, then ranting about something that is not in RHEL (and therefore also not in CentOS) is quite silly. If it is in RHEL, it is here .. if not, then it isn't I don't see that changing in the foreseeable future. But feel free to start a 100 post rant about how screwed up CentOS is if you like. However, a better action would be to buy an RHEL subscription and then convince them that you need more stuff in RHEL. Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
