On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:26:51 -0400 Gerry Reno wrote: > The "yum update" that was running in your lost VNC session was in all > likelihood still running. If yum was indeed still running, it wasn't using any significant CPU. I did run top in my login terminal to see if anything significant was going on and yum didn't show up on the list. When I attempted to re-connect to vncserver after that, I was told "connection refused", and "service vncserver start" cranked up another session for me without any errors. I think vncserver just altogether crashed for some reason, probably related to the yum update that I was running on that machine at the time. I suppose the lesson learned here is to always update the host machine from a screen session running in a plain terminal, not through a vnc session. > It may be easier to restore from backup and then attempt to do the update > again. Perhaps, but since everything seems to still be in place on those hard drives, and since my last "yum update" completed without any errors being reported, I suspect (hope?) that everything is still ok with the exception of whatever is causing the machines to fail to boot. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos