On 03/08/2013 09:21 AM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> On 3/8/2013 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett <harold@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote:
>>>>>> What other information do I need which may be available?
>>>>> What does 'vgscan' say? 'vgchange -a y' ?
>>>>>
>>>> [root@mickey www]# vgscan
>>>> Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
>>>> Found volume group "VolGroup00" using metadata type lvm2
>>>>
>>> Do both Volume Groups on those two sets of disks have the same name?
>>> VolGroup00
>> This is all to common an issue. I make a point that all LVMs are
>> uniquely named.
>>
> Actually, no. The VolGroup00 name is associated with the running system. It's the default name when you install CentOS with the default option. The vol group on the other disks
> is "vg0" and is the name I used when I created the system several years ago.
I would have expected that to show as a result of the vgscan and
vgchange commands. Does RAID change things wrt LVM appareance to the
system?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
