On 02/19/2013 09:07 PM, Markus Falb wrote: > On 20.2.2013 02:20, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 2/19/2013 4:35 PM, Bry8 Star wrote: >>> they can do so bit easily if the old one is visible. >> whats not visible about /var/named/named.ca ? its even listed in >> /etc/named.conf as the root zone. > hmm, here as I understand this: > > A point was made by Robert that named.ca is not necessary at all and > should be removed. > > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2013-February/089740.html > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901741 > > Bry8 said even if named.ca is not necessary it could be still useful for > some so do not remove it from the rpm. I would like to know the use case of its usefulness. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos