Re: A question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:13 AM, David G. Miller <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Red Hat Linux is ancient.
>> <SNIP>
>
>> Advice to OP: Don't spend much money on treeware books about Linux in
>> general or CentOS in particular.  The technology moves fast enough that
the book
>> will be obsolete in six months to a year.  I work best with real books
because I
>> can easily dog-ear, underline, highlight, mark, etc. so I understand
liking
>> a real book.
>
> But real books don't have that 'search' box up at the top...

Les, that's what the index is for.
<snip>
> It is really unfortunate that neither paper books nor pdf's have
> developed the technology to easily show you 'just' those changes so
> you end up starting from scratch every time a developer decides to
> make some small change.  I've always wished for something where you
> could input the version you know and get a description of the changes
> between that and some current version.

The good ones *do* tell you that, in examples, in appendices, on the CD
they give you....

      mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux