Re: Fixed - Re: More on amavis/clam permission errors on Centos 6.3

[Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/31/2013 09:26 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> As you have seen there are differences between the packages. This makes
>>> the CentOS documentation worthless to you as you are not using the same
>>> versions used in the documentation.
>> I had hopes that the 'official' packaging would work well, particularly
>> now that both are on the same release.  I really wanted to do this all
>> 'official' packages.  I know there is nothing wrong with rpmforge, I use
>> it for a number of things, just this time around for mail, I was
>> shooting for 'fully supported cruft'.  Shows how good that approach takes!
> I'm not sure what made you think so,

Oh, I don't know.  Maybe that it is run under the Fedora/Redhat umbrella 
as a recognized SIG? :)

>   but epel is no more "official" than
> rpmforge. It's just another third party repo.
> The only "official" repos are base and updates. Perhaps CR could qualify
> as semi-official... and that's it, I'ld say.
>
> glad Ned could help you solve your problem.

I have submitted a bug report on this:  906396


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos