Il giorno ven, 18/01/2013 alle 11.33 +0100, Timo Schoeler ha scritto: > Ignoring it, because it doesn't hurt? Ignoring the load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 because is only a errata display of load average and the real average is "0,03, 0,03, 0,00"? -- Dario Lesca - sip:dario@xxxxxxxxxx (Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 17 Gnome3) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- From: Dario Lesca <d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:55:15 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <50F924F9.3000507@riscworks.net>
- Organization: Solinos
- References:
- Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- From: Dario Lesca
- Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
- Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- From: Dario Lesca
- Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- From: Timo Schoeler
- Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- Prev by Date: Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- Next by Date: Re: 5.9 logwatch yum filter broken
- Previous by thread: Re: Centos 6.3: load average strangeness
- Next by thread: autofs update brakes nested automount
- Index(es):
 |