> If you do not change any of the CentOS RPMS with your added content then
> it would be fine to use the official CentOS branding and installer.
> Your content as well as ours (the entire compilation) would need to be
> GPL compatible with sources available, etc.
We don't change any CentOS RPMS, and all added RPMS are distributed
under GPL license.
> I assume you are changing at least /etc/redhat-release and other things
> if you are shipping a "distribution" though, so the above is likely not
> true. If you replace CentOS content with your own, then we would
> request that you change the branding for the installer.
We don't neither replace the /etc/redhat-release from the RPM: after the
first boot there is a simple bash script which changes the
redhat-release link.
In the end, I think we can use CentOS name and logos without re-branding.
Thanks for the support.
--
Giacomo Sanchietti
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
