On 01/10/2013 07:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/10/2013 07:16 AM, fred smith wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:29:02AM -0800, John Doe wrote: >>> From: fred smith <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>>> Has anyone managed to get FF 18.0 to work on Centos 5.8? >>>> I've been hacking at it, placing a stack of .so files (from Centos 6) >>>> into a private directory, then using LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point the system to >>>> (in a shellscript that subsequently invokes ff 18) but so far I've not >>>> managed to find the right combination. I've moved over libstdc++, all >>>> or nearly all the .so files from glib2 and glibc packages. now I"m >>>> getting: >>>> >>>> ./firefox: symbol lookup error: ./libstdc++.so.6: undefined symbol: >>>> _ZNSt7num_getIcSt19istreambuf_iteratorIcSt11char_traitsIcEEE2idE, version >>>> GLIBCXX_3.4 >>> I tried to update to 18, and it did not complain about libstd++... >>> I think I only copied: >>> libstdc++.so.6 -> libstdc++.so.6.0.10* >>> libstdc++.so.6.0.10* >>> No other lib or script... >>> But 18 complained about: "Couldn't load XRE functions." >> Yeah, that's what I got, too. Someone on the mozilla site said that >> it requires a later glibc, which is what got me going on moving over >> glibc and glib package shared objects from a centos-6 box. >> >>> Went back to 17.0.1 in the mean time... >> me too. >> >> > You guys do know that we are fairly up2date with firefox/thunderbird on > their ESR program right? > > The Firefox/Thunderbird we have is totally updated for security and gets > upstream support from Mozilla. It does not have every feature, but it > has most and should stay on ESR. > > http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ > More info: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
