On 1/8/2013 11:38 AM, Steve Campbell wrote: > Any one dealt with this particular Dell PE and fencing in any form other > than using something like an APC fence? what about fencing via your storage switch? thats the way I've setup several clusters. the standby server is warm and running, but has no access to the shared storage as its ports on the SAN switch are disabled. this can be done with ethernet or fiberchannel attached storage. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:20:29 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <50EC75AD.8020602@cnpapers.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
- From: Steve Campbell
- Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
- References:
- Fencing a Dell T110 II
- From: Steve Campbell
- Fencing a Dell T110 II
- Prev by Date: Re: wiping out data on a disk (no physical acess to the machine)
- Next by Date: Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
- Next by thread: Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
- Index(es):
 |