On 01/08/2013 11:49 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Why was this chosen? Why is not -extensions v3_req used in the > certificate creation? Because it has to be able to sign itself? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:07:01 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <50EC7831.7060209@htt-consult.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- References:
- Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fencing a Dell T110 II
- Next by Date: wiping out data on a disk (no physical acess to the machine)
- Previous by thread: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is localhost self-signed cert a CA cert?
- Index(es):
 |