On 01/06/2013 09:55 AM fred smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 06:33:07AM -0500, ken wrote:
>> Fred,
>>
>> Also running an up-to-date 5.8 but with just 2G of RAM, clock-applet
>> consumes the following:
>>
>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>> 4133 me 15 0 29568 3748 2944 S 0.0 0.2 190:51.33 clock-applet
>>
>> My uptime at the moment is coming on 68 days. Over time the %CPU field
>> may flicker up to 0.3 or even 0.7, but the RES column and others are
>> steady at the numbers you see. I should add that all Preferences which
>> we'd expect to consume more resources (e.g., display seconds, 12-hour
>> time) are on.
>>
>> Do you use evolution?
>
> no, I have never found it to my liking.
>
>>
>> KDE, Gnome, or other WM?
>
> gnome.
I don't know what to tell you then because, like you, I use gnome but
not evolution. So our systems-- what of them which are directly related
to clock-applet-- are much the same, yet you have a memory problem with
clock-applet which I don't.
Here are some items to compare:
# rpm -q gnome-panel
gnome-panel-2.16.1-7.el5
# ll /usr/libexec/clock-applet
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88048 May 24 2008 /usr/libexec/clock-applet
# md5sum /usr/libexec/clock-applet
9d21ca21a0e99ad26aa10e1cd5b42024 /usr/libexec/clock-applet
>> On 01/04/2013 05:11 PM fred smith wrote:
>>> I've discovered recently that something on my Centos 5.8 box (up to date)
>>> is hogging a ton of RAM.
>>>
>>> so a little while ago I sat and watched top for a while. it showed
>>> (sorry, I didn't take screen shots or write this down, so the numbers
>>> are a bit rough) that out of 8 gigs of swap, around 2 1/2 was in use,
>>> and all the RAM (except for the little the kernel keeps for itself)
>>> was in use (it's got 4 gigs).
>>>
>>> this might not sound bad, but there's hardly ever anything big running
>>> on this box, it's just my home desktop machine used mostly for web
>>> browsing/music/email and similar.
>>>
>>> so, watching top run for a while I could eventually make out that
>>> something had "1.6g" flashing in the "RES" column. slowing the refresh
>>> a little I saw that it was "clock applet". so I killed the clock applet
>>> and restarted it, then clock applet showed "11m" in the "RES" column,
>>> and the unused RAM was suddenly like a gig and 3/4, or so, and the
>>> swap used slowly started dropping while the free ram began being used up,
>>> as it normally should.
>>>
>>> as I continue to watch it run (10-15 mins later) I can see that clock
>>> applet is now showing 14m in the RES column, so it's still growing.
>>>
>>> Is anyone else seeing the clock applet hogging (tons of tiny leaks, I
>>> assume) RAM needlessly?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
