On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But it is. The MAC address on the motherboard port is NOT the same as the
> mystery device. And it DOES match one of the entries in udev's rules, and
> it's operational right now as eth0 (as it should be.) However, the mystery
> MAC address that's listed in udev's rules matches nothing in either lshw or
> lspci.
>
> Remember, udev's rules lists FOUR devices. There are only THREE.
What does the BIOS say about ethernet devices?
Does the motherboard have a management interface card with its own
ethernet port, perhaps potential but not actually installed?
Is there a fiber-optics connector on the system which is coming up as
an ethernet port?
Is one of the cards old enough to still have a separate BNC connector?
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:21:22 -0700
>> Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>>
>> > Yeah, rpmforge or repoforge. But, I'm looking for what exactly? It only
>> > lists a single ethernet port (the built-in one).
>>
>> That's what you're looking for. Now you know that the mysterious device
>> isn't
>> something that you didn't know aobout on the motherboard.
>>
>> --
>> MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
>> www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Dale Dellutri
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
