On Dec 27, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Ibrahim Yurtseven wrote:
> [global]
> workgroup = NETZWERK
> server string = Samba Server Version %v
> security = SHARE
> log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> max log size = 50
> cups options = raw
>
> [public]
> comment = hier kannn reinkopiert werden
> path = /data/public
> read only = No
> create mask = 0777
> guest only = Yes
> guest ok = Yes
> sh-4.1# cat /etc/samba/smbusers
> # Unix_name = SMB_name1 SMB_name2 ...
> root = administrator admin
> nobody = guest pcguest smbguest
> sh-4.1# ls -lisah /data/public
> total 144M
> 1703938 12K drwxrwxrwx. 4 nobody users 12K Dec 27 13:39 .
> 1703937 4.0K drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4.0K Dec 22 19:43 ..
> 1706985 144M -rwxrw-rw- 1 nobody nobody 144M Dec 27 13:39
> Disney_ Alice im Wunderland (1951).mp4
----
perhaps testparam -sv would have been more useful/explicit just to confirm the default values are what you believe them to be but…
assuming that:
ls -ld /data/
ls -ld /data/public
are
rwxrwxrwx (or something that permits user 'nobody')
you might want to ensure that 'guest account = nobody' is specifically set in the global section.
I have no experience with 'security = share' and tend to use 'security = user' and with this setup, I think you can use 'map to bad user' to achieve something similar but I suspect that you can make it work. The concept of security = share is to mimic Windows 95/98 file sharing mode which requires only a password. I don't know that it is well supported by Windows Vista, 7 or 8 clients.
Craig
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
