On 12/26/2012 04:33 AM, Mike Burger wrote: > 169.xxx.xxx.xxx is most certainly a "routable" IP block, as far as > internet standards go. Most of 169/8 is, but presumably he meant 169.254.0.0/16. > The only "non-routable" (i.e. reserved for private networks) IP blocks are: The list is slightly longer than that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses#Reserved_IPv4_addresses _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:18:36 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <25585.209.43.25.133.1356525197.squirrel@www.bubbanfriends.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- From: Gavin Henry
- Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- From: Mike Burger
- Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- References:
- CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- From: Gavin Henry
- Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- From: Mike Burger
- CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- Prev by Date: Re: Excluding file systems from autorelabel
- Next by Date: Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS 5.7 eth0, eth1 and arpwatch flip flops
- Index(es):
 |