On 10/17/12 1:03 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Sorry, I was conflating two things: no web administration of php or the > website? no web adminsitration of php or databases or the OS (no cpanel, webmin). the CMS has web administration of the CMS, but thats only available to the few authenticated users. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: centos 5 and php53
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:44:26 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <6c48ae30eef0db5dd8380f235fe89791.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
- References:
- centos 5 and php53
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: m . roth
- Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: m . roth
- Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: centos 5 and php53
- From: m . roth
- centos 5 and php53
- Prev by Date: Re: centos 5 and php53
- Next by Date: Centos 5.8: starting firefox-16.0.1 kills X
- Previous by thread: Re: centos 5 and php53
- Next by thread: CentOS 6 - Does EFI have an impact beyond the boot sequence?
- Index(es):
 |