Definitely shoot for CentOS 6.3 ...
XFS with a kernel _more recent_ than 2.6.36 (currently shipped with
CentOS6) has more improvements to the XFS code. Youtube video on XFS
[0] - I believe the kernel version noted is 2.6.39 (watch the video!)
[2].
And there's also a Youtube video on BTRFS [1] that was linked
to/shared by Fernando.
[0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-August/128119.html
[1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-August/128110.html
[2] http://lwn.net/Articles/438671/
---~~.~~---
Mike
// SilverTip257 //
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:08 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/27/12 1:52 AM, Nux! wrote:
>> Never had to deal with such a large filesystem, yet, but I'd try XFS on
>> it.
>
> XFS is fairly memory intensive. 11TB file systems tend to mean
> millions and millions of files.
>
> frankly, I wouldn't run this on CentOS 5.6, I would upgrade to CentOS
> 6.latest and then I would use XFS.... support for EXT4 and XFS is
> rather sketchy with the old kernel in 5.x (and why aren't you at 5.8 or
> whatever is current in the 5 series anyways?!?)
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce N 37, W 122
> santa cruz ca mid-left coast
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
