Re: placing x11 libraries in an alternate location

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 09/20/2012 04:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration?  I use bcfg2, 
> and the idea of using a system that doesn't feature reporting, 
> interactive mode, or a "diff" from the running system is... difficult. 

you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch
more - add in mcollective and theforeman to the mix, and you have quite
a nice provision, manage and maintain environ ( I'd say add zabbix,
while keeping an eye on sensu and extramon, in and you have an almost
complete stack there ). The only bit that I think were still missing in
the open source world is a good inventory management layer that
interfaces upstream and downstream.

- KB
-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219    | Yahoo IM: z00dax      | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux