Re: Slightly OT: Red Hat vs Twin Peaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
> Interesting story at Groklaw...just thought I would share:
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120913073511444

Very interesting. I'm not sure I've ever heard of Twin Peaks, and Groklaw
notes they have almost no installed base, if I understood that correctly.

Gluster, on the other hand, has been around for years, and has a
fair-sized installed base, and is moderately well-known. One thing RH
seems to have in reserve is that the patent has not been enforced, and so
they've lost that right.

       mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux