On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ryan Palamara
<Ryan.Palamara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The better option for ZFS would be to get a SSD and move the dedupe table onto that drive instead of having it in RAM, because it can become massive.
What's 'massive' in dollars these days?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:08:53 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <B38F6D4702B61845BE0F57A0CE1EFB57207445@RB-INTRA-EXC.internal.zais.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: Ryan Palamara
- Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- References:
- Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: Rainer Traut
- Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: Dean Jones
- Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- From: Ryan Palamara
- Deduplication data for CentOS?
- Prev by Date: Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- Next by Date: Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- Previous by thread: Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- Next by thread: Re: Deduplication data for CentOS?
- Index(es):
 |