Re: Basic KVM networking question

[Steve Thompson <smt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Steve Thompson wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Dale Dellutri wrote:
>
>> This looks like it should work for Client A, but maybe not for Client B (see
>> below).  So maybe it's a firewall problem (iptables chain FORWARD) on the
>> host?
>>
>> Client B's default route is 192.168.4.1.  This address is not on the host.
>> Did you mean to use .2?  If not, is .1 aware of the routing to the
>> 192.168.0.0/22 network?
>
> Actually I have two similar setups, one with .1 and one with .2, so I
> mixed up the examples here. But in reality it is setup up correctly.
> And it doesn't work for either client :-(

Let me expand on this. There is no issue with a client on net1 
communicating with a client on net2; the host passes packets from one
subnet to the other as it should. The only issue is when the client is a 
virtual machine on the host.

Steve
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos