Re: Simple routing question

[John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and
> 192.168.209.0.  I believe that the present netmask is correct in these
> circumstances.

um, those are both the same?   I assume you meant one of them to be 
different?

when you say therre are two subnets, whats the mask for those two 
'subnets' ?   if its /24 (255.255.255.0) then those subnets would not be 
able to reach the gateway at 192.168.0.1 without additional routing 
information.



-- 
john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos