Re: Is glusterfs ready?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



From: isdtor <isdtor@xxxxxxxxx>
> I can't say anything about the RH Storage Appliance, but for us,
> gluster up to 3.2.x was most definitely not ready.
> ...
> We only started out with 3.0.x, and my impression was that development
> was focusing on new features rather than bug fixes.

From: David C. Miller <millerdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I'm using gluster 3.3.0-1 ...
> Been running this since 3.3 came out. I did quite a bit 
> of failure testing before going live. So far it is working well.

I read that 3.3 was the first "RH" release.
Let's hope they did/will focus on bug fixing...
So I guess I will wait a little bit more.

Thx to both,
JD
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux