Am 27.08.2012 22:55, schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 14:32 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Rainer Traut <tr.ml@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> We have looked into lessfs, sdfs and ddar.
>>> Are these filesystems ready to use (on centos)?
>>> ddar is sthg different, I know.
>> This is something I have been thinking about peripherally for a while
>> now. What are your impressions of SDFS (OpenDedupe)? I had been
>> hoping it would be pretty good. Any issues with it on CentOS?
>
> I've used it for backups; it works reliably. It is memory hungry
> however [sort of the nature of block-level deduplication].
> <http://www.wmmi.net/documents/OpenDedup.pdf>
I have read the pdf and one thing strikes me:
--io-chunk-size <SIZE in kB; use 4 for VMDKs, defaults to 128>
and later:
● Memory
● 2GB allocation OK for:
● 200GB@4KB chunks
● 6TB@128KB chunks
...
32TB of data at 128KB requires
8GB of RAM. 1TB @ 4KB equals
the same 8GB.
We are using ESXi5 in a SAN environment, right now with a 2TB backup volume.
You are right, 16GB of ram is still much...
And why 4k chunk size for VMDKs?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
