Re: LVM overhead? Does it cripple I/O?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 19.08.2012 23:16, Smithies, Russell wrote:
> For a high-performance system (64-cores, 512GB RAM, 5TB local disk,
> 110TB NFS-mounted storage) is there any advantage of dropping lvm and
> mounting partitions directly?
> We're not planning on changing partition sizes, but if we did we'd
> probably do a full rebuild.
> Has anyone done performance testing to show that lvm isn't crippling 
> I/O?
>
> Thanx,
>
> Russell

I'm a long time user of LVM and I never noticed any problems with it, 
let alone "crippling IO".
In some benchmarks[1] it even speeds up things and I believe the 
Anaconda automatic partitioning defaults to LVM, too.

[1] - 
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora_15_lvm&num=3



-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux