Re: samba problem with kernel 2.6.32-279.*

[Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxxx>]

On 08/15/2012 10:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I don't this would impact it, but if the underlying file system of the
> samba machine's file system is ext4 and if it is a 64-bit machine, it might.
>
> http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-bit-by-ext4-structure-change/

I guess this must be:

# rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.32-279.el6|fgrep hash|fgrep ext4
- [fs] ext4: return 32/64-bit dir name hash according to usage type (J. 
Bruce Fields) [813070]

Is the 813070 number a bugzilla entry? I get an access denied when
trying to read it.

Is there an easy way to remove this patch to test it (in a test 
environment, the main server is back on the old kernel)?

In the Good Old Days redhat kernel SRPMS were a vanilla kernel plus
1.0e+117 patches, now it doesn't look so simple.

Mogens

-- 
Mogens Kjaer, mk@xxxxxxx
http://www.lemo.dk
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos